Have Energy Saving Policies Gone Too Far?
Asking if energy saving policies have gone too far is a valid question. I hear it just about every day – someone complaining about how ridiculous the building codes are getting.
“The over-reaching building codes are making it too expensive to build in California!”
There is no doubt that the California Building Code is becoming more stringent when it comes to energy savings. The new 2019 edition of the CBC will continue to push the energy saving limits for envelope and building systems.
There is some truth in the of the above statements. However I think what concerns most people is the feeling that all of these things are just out of control.
It feels as if everything to do with energy has developed it’s own momentum, leading to spirally costs. It may appear as if it is out of control. This is not true, in fact, the great State of California has a plan. It’s a plan that started way back in 1974 when the Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act which created the California Energy Commission (CEC).
The CEC’s core responsibilities are:
Advancing State Energy Policy — As the state’s primary energy policy and planning agency, the California Energy Commission prepares the Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR) and works with state and federal agencies, utilities, and others to develop state energy policies.
Achieving Energy Efficiency — Responsible for reducing the state’s electricity and natural gas demand. This is done by adopting new Building and Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards. These standards contribute to keeping California’s annual electricity consumption relatively low.
Investing in Energy Innovation — Advanced innovation through its energy research by investing millions of dollars in technologies to improve California’s energy systems and resources.
Developing Renewable Energy — Efforts to promote and support renewable energy development.
Transforming Transportation — Transportation accounts for a major portion of California’s energy budget and has a significant impact on air quality. It is also the single largest source of the State’s greenhouse gas emissions.
Overseeing Energy Infrastructure — The certification and compliance of thermal power plants 50 megawatts (MW) and larger, including all project-related facilities in California.
Preparing for Energy Emergencies — In 1988, the California Energy Commission developed California’s first comprehensive Energy Shortage Contingency Plan. Today, the Energy Commission continues to lead the State’s energy emergency planning efforts.
California DOES Have an Energy Plan – and its a Good One
No, California’s energy policies have not gone too far, nor are they out of control.
Since it’s inception the California Energy Commission has been pushing the state forward in a very organized and controlled manner.
It is very easy to complain about the impacts on isolated aspects of our PG&E bills or the cost of gasoline. However, it helps to understand that instead of spiraling out of control, our energy resources and their associated costs, are rapidly moving to lower costs, and lower impacts. Within the next 10 years our energy usage, and the comparative costs, will be drastically reduced.
I know what you’re thinking. “This guy is just some weenie shilling for the State.” Well, I have been called a weenie, so I’ll give you that! However, if you care to take just a minute to review the CEC’s 2018 (2018_energycommisson_accomplishments) report on their accomplishments from last year, it just might change your mind. Some of the highlights include:
During 2018, the Energy Commission approved building energy efficiency standards requiring solar panels on all new homes.
Proposition 39 program has provided more than $1.6 billion to schools to install energy efficiency upgrades and lower energy bills.
This year, Governor Brown signed an executive order calling for at least five million zero-emission vehicles on California roads by 2030, as well as a significant increase in the charging and refueling infrastructure to power these vehicles.
During its final year of processing new grants, the Energy Commission’s Proposition 39 K-12 program provided more than $1.5 billion in funds to 98 percent of public school districts to improve 7,300 school buildings and help lower energy bills.
The Energy Commission invested $5 million in a community-scale energy efficiency demonstration project with the California Home-building Foundation in Fresno County. The objective of the project is to overcome cost barriers to designing and building near-zero-emission homes through installing and monitoring high-efficiency systems, appliances, and other measures.
In 2018, the CEC funded more than a dozen energy storage projects such as a 30 megawatt (MW) lithium-ion battery storage facility in San Diego, capable of storing up to 120 megawatt-hours of energy and serving up to 20,000 customers for four hours.
The master plan behind the CEC’s goals is the California Integrated Energy Policy. During the Spring of 2003, California’s three principal
energy agencies created a common vision to direct the future efforts at the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the California Power Authority (CPA), and the Energy Commission.
The California Integrated Energy Policy Report
The Energy Report consists of a Policy Report and three accompanying volumes. In the Policy Report, the Energy Commission assesses the major energy trends and issues facing the state. It uses these results to recommend energy policies that will push the state forward in reducing energy consumption.
The three volumes address electricity and natural gas, transportation and infrastructure and public interest energy strategies
The 2018 Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR) lays out the goals for the current year. The key energy polices targeted include:
• Increase from one-third to 50 percent the state’s electricity derived from renewable sources.
• Reduce petroleum use in cars and trucks by up to 50 percent.
• Double the efficiency of existing buildings while making heating fuels cleaner.
• Reduce the relentless release of methane, black carbon, and other potent pollutants across industries.
• Manage farm and range lands, forests, and wetlands so they can store carbon.
So, is the IEP program really working – or just a bunch of political hype? The answer to this question can be summed up by this simple fact:
California’s total energy consumption is second-highest in the nation, but, in 2016, the state’s per capita energy consumption ranked 48th, due in part to its energy efficiency programs.
The method is working.
You can view the complete 2018 IEPR report here: California Integrated Energy Policy